Jul
02
2009

Lost in Esolang

Pro-tip: at this point even real programmers would concede it'd be easier to start over with different universal constants such that the universe would evolve such that brainfuck was not invented.

Happy Birthday Amber.

Source:

+ + + + [ > + + + + < - ] > + [ > + + >
+ + + + > + + + + + + > + + + + + + + <
< < < - ] > > + + + + . > - . + + + + +
+ + . . + + + . < < - - . < < + + + + +
+ [ > > > - > - > - < < < < < - ] > > >
. > . > + . + + . < - . - - - - . - - -
. > + + + + + . < < < . > - . > > > + +
+ [ < < + + + + > > - ] < < . < < [ > +
< < + > - ] > + . < < + + + . > > > +
+ + + + . < < < - - . [ - ] > [ - ] >
[ - ] > [ - ] > [ - ] < < < < <

Interpreter: http://www.iamcal.com/misc/bf_debug/

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 2nd, 2009 at 20:20 and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

«
»

5 Responses to “Lost in Esolang”

  1. n yan says:
    2009 July 02 at 20:25

    In the process of making this:

    me: have you ever coded
    me: brainfuck before
    jlau (friend): OMG U CUSSED
    jlau: and no
    jlau: LOL
    jlau: hhahahhahahha
    me: >_< me: it doesn’t count me: if it’s me: a proper noun jlau: LOL jlau: WORST EXCUSE EVER me: T_____T

  2. else says:
    2009 July 03 at 01:59

    I can relate to this.. I wrote some BF recently and only later found that javascript interpreter with the debugger. It’s even more painful without…

    ++++[>+++++[>+++++>++++++<<-]>–.>———.+++.<+++.-.[-]++++++++++.

  3. depesz says:
    2009 July 03 at 07:08

    +++++[>+++++++++
    +++++>++++++++++
    +++++++++>++++++
    >++<<<++.>++
    .+++++++++++++++
    ..+++++++++.>++.
    <——
    ———-.+++++
    ++++.++.——–
    —-.—-.—.>>
    >++++++[<<
    >>-]<<.<-
    ———–.—-
    ——-.+++.++++
    +++++++++.>+.>.

  4. walter stucco says:
    2009 July 03 at 08:09

    i got this running the debugger :)

    Hello Birthday Amb#r!

  5. n yan says:
    2009 July 03 at 13:25

    else I think you may be missing a closing parenthesis.

Leave a Reply